Comparative tests

We have carried out various tests in certified laboratories to demonstrate the benefits of using acoustic mounts. In these tests, we compare the results of rigidly installed ceilings against suspended ceilings with rubber and Sylomer mounts.

CONSTRUCTION SYSTEM 1

Scheme Description
light_slab_22mm

RIGID SOLUTION

  • 22mm Chipboard
  • 80x220 mm section wooden beams (with 100mm mineral wool interleaved)
  • Nonius Rigid Fixation - 210mm< /li>
  • Plasterboard
  • * Air gap: 430mm

light_slab_22mm

ELASTIC SOLUTION

  • 22mm Chipboard
  • 80x220 mm section wooden beams (with 100mm mineral wool interleaved)
  • Akustik 1 Nonius + Sylomer® - 180mm
  • Plasterboard
  • * Air gap: 400mm

Impact noise results - calculated according to Standard

ISO 10140-3
Airborne noise results - calculated according to Standard

ISO 10140-2
Impact_noise Airborne_noise
Impact_noise Airborne_noise
Impact_noise Airborne_noise
Go to the Impact Noise Results Report (PDF) - Nonius Fixation Go to the Airborne Noise Results Report (PDF) - Nonius Fixation
Go to the Impact Noise Results Report (PDF) - Akustik 1 Nonius + Sylomer® Go to the Airborne Noise Results Report (PDF) - Akustik 1 Nonius + Sylomer®


CONSTRUCTION SYSTEM 2

Scheme Description
light_slab_22mm

RIGID SOLUTION

  • 65mm fibreboard
  • 22mm chipboard
  • 80x220 mm section wooden beams (with 100mm mineral wool interleaved)
  • Nonius Rigid Fixation - 210mm
  • Plasterboard
  • * Air gap: 430mm

light_slab_22mm

ELASTIC SOLUTION

  • 65mm fibreboard
  • 22mm chipboard
  • 80x220 mm section wooden beams (with 100mm mineral wool interleaved)
  • Akustik 1 Nonius + Sylomer® - 180mm
  • Plasterboard
  • * Air gap: 400mm

Impact noise results - calculated according to Standard

ISO 10140-3
Airborne noise results - calculated according to Standard

ISO 10140-2
Impact_noise Airborne_noise
IFT-graph. Airborne_noise
Impact_noise Airborne_noise
Go to the Impact Noise Results Report (PDF) - Nonius Fixation Go to the Airborne Noise Results Report (PDF) - Nonius Fixation
Go to the Impact Noise Results Report (PDF) - Akustik 1 Nonius + Sylomer® Go to the Airborne Noise Results Report (PDF) - Akustik 1 Nonius + Sylomer®


CONSTRUCTION SYSTEM 3

Scheme Description
0

RIGID SOLUTION CONF.A

  • 1. 18mm OSB
  • 2. 235x50mm Timber Joists
  • 3. 100mm Mineral Wool
  • 4. 2x15mm Plasterboards
0

ELASTIC SOLUTION CONF.C

  • 1. 18mm OSB
  • 2. 235x50mm Timber Joists
  • 3. 100mm Mineral Wool
  • 4. AMC Akustik + Sylomer® 15 Channel Clips with MF5 Ceiling Furring Channels
  • 5. 2x15mm Plasterboards

Natural frequency: 9.4Hz

Impact noise results – calculated according to BS EN

ISO 10140-3:2021
Airborne noise results - calculated according to BS EN

ISO 10140-2:2021
0
0
RIGID SOLUTION CONF.A
Ln,w: 76 dB IIC 34 RW: 44 dB STC 44
Go to Impact Noise Results Report Ln (PDF) Go to Airborne Noise Results Report R (PDF)
ELASTIC SOLUTION CONF.C
Ln,w: 56 dB IIC 54 RW: 63 dB STC 64
Go to Impact Noise Results Report Ln (PDF) Go to Airborne Noise Results Report R (PDF)


INTRODUCTION

The Labein technology centre performed a series of comparative tests to confirm the good acoustic results of Akustik+Sylomer®. This centre is officially ENAC-certified and complies with the requirements of the ISO 140-1:1997 standard.

The purpose of the test is to compare, in equal conditions, the acoustic isolation to air-borne noise of a suspended ceiling without anti-vibration suspensions (direct transmission) to a suspended ceiling with the new Akustik + Sylomer® suspensions.

The secondary endpoint is to compare the Akustik + Sylomer® to another suspension with the same size-specific characteristics using high-resilience natural rubber from our Akustik 4 45 shore A standard series.

TEST METHODOLOGY

The reports contain the results of the noise isolation test to airborne noise conducted according to the UNE-EN ISO 140-3 standard for a suspended ceiling with the following ceiling mounts:

  • Direct transmission (without anti-vibration suspensions).
  • Akustik 4 45 shore A.
  • Akustik 3+ Sylomer®30 Type B.

Besides these tests, the pink noise isolation index, R(A), was calculated, between 100 Hz at 5KHz, as the index specified by the basic building standard: NBE-CA 88 “Acoustic conditions”. The weighted noise reduction index (Rw) of the specimen, as well as the terms of adaptation to the C and Ctr spectrum, were obtained according to the UNE EN ISO 717-1 standard from the isolation curve.

COMPARATIVE RESULTS OF THE TEST BETWEEN A SUSPENDED CEILING WITH AND WITHOUT AKUSTIK + SYLOMER®


Graphic 1 shows the isolation provided by a single plasterboard suspended with Akustik + Sylomer® suspensions and the same ceiling fitted with M6 rod. The blue line represents the isolation achieved with Akustik + Sylomer® mounts.


As can be seen, there are major differences at low and high frequencies, offering a difference of:

  • 3 dB at 125 Hz
  • 6 dB at 250 Hz
  • 5 dB at 500 Hz
  • 5 dB at 1000Hz

At the same time, comparative tests were conducted with ceilings with a greater number of plasterboards. Table 1 shows the results of the RW reduction index:

RW (C; Ctr) sound isolation index Without suspensions (M6 rod) With suspensions Akustik + Sylomer®
1 plasterboard 71 (-4; -10) dB
(STC: 69)
75 (-4; -10) dB
(STC: 72)
2 plasterboards 73 (-3; -9) dB
(STC: 72)
75 (-3; -8) dB
(STC: 74)
3 plasterboards 74 (-3; -8) dB
(STC: 73)
77 (-3; -8) dB
(STC: 74)

It is clear that the use of Akustik + Sylomer® suspensions provides far greater airborne isolations, which in some cases are equivalent to or greater than the use of 2 or 3 plasterboards with anti-vibration ceiling mounts.

COMPARATIVE RESULTS OF THE TEST BETWEEN A SUSPENDED CEILING WITH AKUSTIK + SYLOMER VS RUBBER SUSPENSIONS


Table 2 compares the RW sound isolation index according to the number of plasterboards.

RW (C; Ctr) sound isolation index With Akustik + Sylomer® suspensions With rubber suspensions
1 plasterboard 75 (-4; -10) dB (STC: 73) 74 (-3; -9) dB (STC: 74)
2 plasterboards 75 (-3; -8) dB (STC: 74) 75 (-4; -10) dB (STC: 71)
3 plasterboards 77 (-3; -8) dB (STC: 74) 76 (-4; -10) dB (STC: 72)

The improvement is self-evident. the Akustik + Sylomer® mounts offer a superior isolation to the rubber mounts. This difference is so great that it may be said that a ceiling with a plasterboard with Akustik + Sylomer® offers the same isolation as a ceiling with two plasterboard rubber suspensions. This therefore means savings in time and material.

The savings in plasterboard and labour costs make these mounts particularly interesting. both technically and economically.

In order to provide a better analysis of the differences between the rubber mounts and the Akustik + Sylomer® mounts. table 3 shows the isolation data at different frequencies.

Suspended ceiling with 1 plasterboard
Frequency Akustik + Sylomer® Rubber
160 Hz. 58,3 dB 57,5 dB
250 Hz. 68,4 dB 66 dB
500 Hz. 80,3 dB 79,1 dB
 
Suspended ceiling with 2 plasterboards
Frequency Akustik + Sylomer® Rubber
160 Hz. 57 dB 56,9 dB
250 Hz. 70 dB 68 dB
500 Hz. 81,5 dB 81,1 dB
 
Suspended ceiling with 3 plasterboards
Frequency Akustik + Sylomer® Rubber
160 Hz. 60,4 dB 58,5 dB
250 Hz. 69,4 dB 67 dB
500 Hz. 82,4 dB 81,1 dB

The results of these tables show that the isolation differences are in the low frequency range. which is particularly interesting for the isolation of premises interesting for the isolation of premises particularly difficult to isolate.

DOWNLOADS

Download tests made by the The Labein technology centre, to confirm the good acoustic results of Akustik + Sylomer®.

This centre is officially ENAC-certified and complies with the requirements of the ISO 140-1:1997 standard.

ORIGINAL SLAB

 

RIGID INSTALLATION

 

AKUSTIK (RUBBER)

 

AKUSTIK + SYLOMER®

 

INTRODUCTION

The majority of buildings use concrete structures as the base material for the construction of different works. It is a low-priced material compared to steel, with a resistance similar to or greater than that of brick, which offers the possibility of building elements of almost any shape.

For this study, a range of tests have been carried out using different solutions for floating floor and the suspended ceiling installations with different types of supports.

CONSTRUCTION SYSTEM 1

Scheme Description
light_slab_22mm

REFERENCE

  • Concrete Slab 140 mm
light_slab_22mm

RIGID SOLUTION

  • Concrete Slab 140mm
  • RockWool 100 mm
  • Rigid Fixation
  • Metal Profile
  • Plasterboard 2x13mm
  • * Air gap: 100mm

light_slab_22mm

RUBBER SOLUTION

  • Concrete Slab 140mm
  • RockWool 100 mm
  • Rubber Fixation
  • Metal Profile
  • Plasterboard 2x13mm
  • * Air gap: 100mm

light_slab_22mm

SYLOMER SOLUTION

  • Concrete Slab 140mm
  • RockWool 100 mm
  • Akustik+Syomer®
  • Metal Profile
  • Plasterboard 2x13mm
  • * Air gap: 130mm

Impact noise results - calculated according to Standard

ISO 10140-3
Airborne noise results - calculated according to Standard

ISO 10140-2
Impact_noise Airborne_noise
IFT-graph. Airborne_noise
Go to the Impact Noise Results Report (PDF) - REFERENCE Go to the Airborne Noise Results Report (PDF) - REFERENCE
Go to the Impact Noise Results Report (PDF) - RIGID SOLUTION Go to the Airborne Noise Results Report (PDF) - RIGID SOLUTION
Go to the Impact Noise Results Report (PDF) - RUBBER SOLUTION Go to the Airborne Noise Results Report (PDF) - RUBBER SOLUTION
Go to the Impact Noise Results Report (PDF) - SYLOMER SOLUTION Go to the Airborne Noise Results Report (PDF) - SYLOMER SOLUTION